the course is in good condition. it was enjoyable to play.

Encino is in typical winter condition. The fairways are dormant but are starting to come alive. The sand traps could use more sand; one of them had practically no sand. The course appears to have survived the recent heavy rain without any problem.

The fairways on this course need work. The grass is dormant but there are many bare spots. The greens and collars are in very good condition and overall it was enjoyable to play.

I played last Thursday early in about 4:15. The course was in typical winter condition with lots of tight lies on the fairways. The greens were generally in good shape. A couple of weeks of 80 degree weather would make everything fine.

the north course is in good condition. there were a few wet spots but overall it was a pleasure to play.

I played at about 7am in a 4some and it took about 4 hours. The course is in good codition and for added excitement there were 2 coyotes running around. They seemed to be in good shape also.

I played in 3:45, teeing off in a foursome at 6:30. The course was in surprisingly good shape, considering the time of year and amount of play. The greens were reasonably good and would be significantly better if golfers would repair their ball marks. An enjoyable round!

This course was jammed on Monday at 6 am. I on the waiting list for 2 hours before actually teeing off. Play was extremely slow ( 5somes are allowed). The front 9 is in bad - to - poor shape. The 7th green is atrocious and American Golf ought ot spend some of that 5some money to redo that green. The back 9 is in much better condition. It was an awful experience due to the wait and slow play. Too many regulars dominate the early hours. I won't be going back anytime soon.

I played Soule Park for the first time in 8-10 years. The course is in excellent shape and was a pleasure to play. One sand trap I was in had about 3 or 4 grains of sand and the rest was bare dirt. The other one was in okay shape but could have used more sand. Overall, it was well worth my 73 mile drive to play there. I played in a threesome in about 3:45, teeing off around 6:30am. The greens were in great shape.

I played San Clemente on 7-15-03 for the first time, teeing off in a 4some at about 6:30 am and played in about 4:15. Pace of play was good. There were lots of brown/bare spots in the fairways and rough,especially on the front nine. The back nine was in better shape. Some of the tees were in terrible condition with bare spots and heavy divot damage. Course maintainance could use a major upgrade. The greens were in very good condition but had not been mowed and seemed slower than they appeared. The layout is okay but the course needs a lot of work.

I played today in a 5some, teeing off at about 7:15 and finishing in 4:45. Very slow. The course is in good condition but a few of the greens are not so good, especially #1. It was enjoyable but play is way too slow. they should try allowing a group to tee off on #1 only after the group ahead has cleared the first green, which would alleviate the big backups at 2, 3, and 4.

I played CW on 6-24-03, teeing off in a foursome and playing in about 3:45. Some of the greens were rough and bumpy but a lot were in fairly good condition. The fairways were in very good shape; the sand traps were poor with not enough sand. Overall, it was an enjoyable round.