Search for golf courses in California, Arizona, Nevada, Hawaii, Florida, Texas, Utah, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington, Colorado.
- Maintenance Pending | 
- Major Maintenance | 
- Minor Maintenance/Recovering from Major Maintenance | 
- No Maintenance | 
- This Course
$'s Average Weekend Peak Rates ($ = <$50, $$ = $50-$100... ranges increment by $50) |
- Photos | 
- Scorecard | 
- Rates or Specials
- OR -
- Maintenance Pending | - Major Maintenance | - Minor Maintenance/Recovering from Major Maintenance | - No Maintenance | - This Course$'s Average Weekend Peak Rates ($ = <$50, $$ = $50-$100... ranges increment by $50) |
- Photos | - Scorecard | - Rates or SpecialsLatest Golf Course Review
Rode the Blues (6348/71.3/130) with 24hourgolf in 4H early morning using UP. Calm, overcast and chilly made for a long course. Matched up with Sebastian and Diego, 7th and 5th graders respectively. Coming from a family of golf professionals, they both had beautiful swings. The 5th grader had not hit his growth spurt yet and played the red tees. I honestly would have thought the 7th grader was a college golfer just watching from afar. He was consistently 275 in the middle with a killer short game and shot a -2 70 from the Blues?!?!?!
Schmidy/Curley design that is a solid, challenging layout. Not an overly tight layout, but you cannot miss most fairways here by much without bringing penalty strokes (lost ball bushes & native overgrowth) into play. A couple of risk/reward par 4's that longer hitters can have a go at the green.
The tees were at best okay. Most of the par 4/5 tees had good coverage and were decent. Most of the par 3 tees were in mediocre to poor condition with lots of divots.
The fairways were patchy with good coverage, about 50/50 thin/lush.
The rough was lush, thick and penal, especially when wet early in the round.
The sand traps were well raked. However, damp and hard packed with inconsistent depths is challenging to play out of on hard/fast greens.
The large green complexes were nicely designed with mounds, slopes and contours to challenge you whether you were on or off the greens. The poa annua greens were quick. Medium fast to fast speed and firm. Slightly better condition overall than the Legends greens IMO.
This would be a very challenging course to walk, numerous tees were a hike from the last green. The carts have nice GPS. All grass range is a plus. The customer service was excellent from everyone, no drink cart today. Recommended if you get a deal, but I would not pay rack rate for these conditions.
Schmidy/Curley design that is a solid, challenging layout. Not an overly tight layout, but you cannot miss most fairways here by much without bringing penalty strokes (lost ball bushes & native overgrowth) into play. A couple of risk/reward par 4's that longer hitters can have a go at the green.
The tees were at best okay. Most of the par 4/5 tees had good coverage and were decent. Most of the par 3 tees were in mediocre to poor condition with lots of divots.
The fairways were patchy with good coverage, about 50/50 thin/lush.
The rough was lush, thick and penal, especially when wet early in the round.
The sand traps were well raked. However, damp and hard packed with inconsistent depths is challenging to play out of on hard/fast greens.
The large green complexes were nicely designed with mounds, slopes and contours to challenge you whether you were on or off the greens. The poa annua greens were quick. Medium fast to fast speed and firm. Slightly better condition overall than the Legends greens IMO.
This would be a very challenging course to walk, numerous tees were a hike from the last green. The carts have nice GPS. All grass range is a plus. The customer service was excellent from everyone, no drink cart today. Recommended if you get a deal, but I would not pay rack rate for these conditions.
5 Likes.